Comparison · no crown · not tax or legal advice

Deferred vs LikeKind

Deferred Inc. and LikeKind are both listed Qualified Intermediaries. Ownership as published: unpublished vs unpublished. This table is the two custody files side by side. It does not award a best QI, invent fees, or fill blanks. A Delaware Statutory Trust interest, if mentioned, is typically a securities offering — a listing here is a custody file.

Deferred fileLikeKind fileView checklistCheck custody controls

Published facts, side by side

FieldDeferredLikeKind
Legal nameDeferred Inc.LikeKind
Ownership (as published)Parent unpublishedParent unpublished
FEAFEA unknownFEA unknown
CES®Not published on cited pagesNot published on cited pages
How funds are heldSegregatedSegregated
Fund-handling noteClient funds held at a commercial bank in a segregated deposit account; firm also describes individual FDIC-insured accounts and interest-bearing placement.Homepage comparison table under Security of Funds: segregated account and $175M FDIC. No TIN-title sentence, named bank, or dual-signature / qualified-escrow mechanic on the pages cited. The same homepage also shows a ‘We’re launching pretty soon!’ waitlist banner — treat the custody line as current marketing, and confirm the live account before a wire.
Dual-signature / who can wireWire controls unknownWire controls unknown
Fidelity / E&O (published)$10 million fidelity bond · $5 million errors and omissionsNot published on cited pages
Other published coverageUp to $175 million FDIC coverage claimed via bank / deposit structureHomepage comparison table: ‘Segregated account, $175M FDIC.’ That is a marketed deposit-structure figure, not a fidelity bond or E&O certificate.
ReverseYesUnknown
ImprovementYesUnknown
DST (QI administration, not an offering)UnknownUnknown
Published feesForward/standard: published No Fee Exchange ($0). Reverse: starting at $7,000. Improvement/construction: starting at $7,500. Firm states no hidden junk fees on its model; marketing calculator shows illustrative 2.00% APY as of December 11, 2025.Homepage hero and comparison table: $0 exchange fees and no origination fees. Comparison table contrasts that with ‘Typically $999–$1500+’ at other QIs — competitor pricing is their marketing, not this directory’s survey.
Who keeps interestFirm keeps a share of interest earned on exchange funds as its compensation and shares interest with the exchanger (rates/illustrations dated as of December 11, 2025 on marketing pages).Homepage: high-yield interest accrued daily. Separate closing-liquidity block: the firm will wire 1.5% interest from sale proceeds at closing as an advance. Illustration: $9,000,000 net proceeds → $135,000 wired at closing. Caption: ‘Advance assumes forward exchange funds held for 180 days at a 1.5% annual interest rate as of April 29th, 2026.’ Dated marketing illustration, not a guarantee.
File last sourced2026-09-042026-09-09

What stays unknown

Deferred:parent, FEA, CES, dual-signature, DST administration

LikeKind:parent, FEA, CES, dual-signature, fidelity bond dollars, E&O dollars, reverse, improvement, DST administration

Unknown is omitted, not graded.Report missing infoif you have a primary URL we missed.

FAQ

Which of these QIs is better?

This page does not pick a winner. It places published custody fields from two QI File listings side by side. A thicker disclosure is not a grade, and an unpublished field is not a finding that the firm is unsafe.

Can I treat a parent logo or a bond number on this table as current coverage?

No. Parent is an ownership note. Insurance figures appear only when the firm’s cited page still prints them. Ask for current certificates. See how to read a listing and segregated vs dual-signature.

Where are the full source lists?

Open the two custody files: Deferred and LikeKind. Every figure on this page is copied from those files.

Sources

Copied from the two firm files. Open those pages for the dated URL list.

More pairs:compare index. Compare these firms only on published custody facts.

Related